Google will be updating its Core Web Vitals metrics on March 12, 2024, by introducing Interaction to Next Paint (INP) as a new measure of responsiveness to replace First Input Delay (FID).
For those unfamiliar with INP, FID, or the Core Web Vitals, we recently put together a comprehensive guide to assist in understanding these metrics. Both FID and INP are used to evaluate the responsiveness and interactivity of a website, forming part of Google's broader Core Web Vitals initiative, which aims to assess the quality of the user experience on any given website.
Websites with strong FID or INP scores are often characterised as "fast" and "snappy," whereas those with lower scores may be considered "sluggish" and "laggy." Essentially, these scores focus on the time it takes for a website element to respond after user interaction.
Consider a button as an example. Upon clicking a button, one would anticipate a color change to indicate that the click was acknowledged. If this color transition were to take a mere second, the website's performance might appear sluggish, leading to a subpar user experience. It is important to note that while FID and INP share similarities, they are not identical metrics.
Google's team recently introduced the INP release to improve upon the limitations of the existing FID metric. The primary difference between the two metrics is that FID focuses solely on the initial user interaction with a site, while INP considers all interactions throughout the user experience.
For detailed technical information on INP, the web.dev team offers a thorough analysis on their
blog.
The shift to INP is driven by the need for a more holistic assessment of user experience. A website that consistently provides fast and responsive interactions stands out as superior to one that is responsive only at the beginning.
Google recently introduced the new metric called INP, sparking our curiosity. Given that our clients throughout the UK depend on us for exceptional Core Web Vitals, it was crucial for us to promptly adjust our platform to meet this new standard. By using Google Chrome's Dev Tools, our platform engineering team meticulously analysed the INP metrics to pinpoint delays in different user interactions across various websites. This detailed assessment revealed common problems that, once addressed on a broad scale, led to significant enhancements in performance.
These targeted enhancements notably boosted the INP scores of our websites, elevating the user experience in tandem. Crucially, this initiative enabled us to uphold our reputation for delivering exceptional Core Web Vital scores that our clients trust.
Website developers may find the shift to INP to be an interesting development rather than an urgent matter. Our engineering team continuously improves the technologies that support all platform sites to ensure they achieve the best possible Core Web Vital scores, including INP.
You can now see the new INP metric for yourself through Google's PageSpeed Insights tool in the "Other Notable Metrics" section.
While the majority of sites on our platform are currently rated as "Good" for all Core Web Vital metrics, there are some exceptions. Sites that use proprietary code or custom/third-party widgets may need additional optimisations to boost their score.
Monitoring your Core Web Vitals scores is essential for optimising your SEO performance. While these metrics are significant for ranking your site, it's important to consider other factors as well. Aspects such as image alt-text, meta titles, meta descriptions, and the quality of your site content can also impact your visibility and position in search results.
If you need assistance or guidance in improving your SEO strategies, don't hesitate to contact us. We're here to help you enhance your online presence.